PHIL 347N Week 3 Discussion 1; Distinguishing Deductive from Inductive Reasoning

  • PHIL 347N Week 3 Discussion 1; Distinguishing Deductive from Inductive Reasoning
  • $10.00


Institution Chamberlain
Contributor Bianca

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 5, 6
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source

Initial Post Instructions
Deductive
 arguments are top-down, working from general principles to specific cases. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, is bottom-up, working from specific observations and looking for patterns that lead to a general conclusion. Your career path in healthcare and health-related fields will present many problems that will require critical reasoning. Think about potential issues or even issues you have already encountered. Determine what type of critical reasoning - inductive or deductive - best suits the situation - or do you need both? If you are short on ideas, use one of these scenarios as a starting point:

  • Suppose you are on a committee that has to decide whether to cut nursing staff or social services staff. How would you approach the problem?
  • Suppose your hospital suddenly sees an enormous increase in emergency room patients, and you are on a committee to investigate the problem and relieve pressure on the ER. How would you approach the problem?

 

Follow-Up Post Instructions

Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.

 

Writing Requirements

Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up)

APA format for in-text citations and list of references

 

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:

  • Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines

 

 

Instituition / Term
Term Fall 2019
Institution Chamberlain
Contributor Bianca
 

Related Products